The COVID-19 pandemic, along with historical inequities, resulted in a widening of the achievement gap between underserved populations and more advantaged students. In response to this issue, California took action by allocating additional funds to public school districts for out-of-school-time services through the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELOP). This study examined how a public school district and three external organizations negotiated the development of a viable plan for implementing the first year of summer ELOP programming. The multiple case study included qualitative analysis of the collaborative process between each district–organization dyad. Each dyad was analyzed as an independent case and then a cross-case analysis was completed. Results revealed two significant components of the emergent collaborative relationship, including developing a shared vision and creating new practices. The study identified key competencies from previous domains that support or obstruct the development of a shared project and highlighted the critical role of a broker in fostering alignment and community development. Implications for practice include strategies for effective interorganizational collaboration and innovation in educational programs.

The researcher explored the impact of a student voice initiative (SVI), the Student Ambassador Council (SAC), on the social-emotional competencies (SECs) of middle school, 5th- 8th grades students. Drawing upon the principles of youth empowerment, more specifically Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR), and social-emotional learning (SEL), the SAC provided a platform for students to actively participate in decision-making processes within their school community. The researcher employed action research using a mixed methodologies approach, combining surveys, interviews, and participant observations to gather data on students' experiences and perceptions of the SAC. Quantitative analysis of pre- and post-surveys did not reveal significant improvements in students' SECs following their participation in the SAC. However, qualitative data from open-ended questions on the post-survey, interviews and observation provided further clarity demonstrating the initiative fosters growth in students’ perceptions of Student Voice, Social Awareness and Self-Efficacy in addition to student development in confidence, self-directed learning and civic engagement. Moreover, the study also suggested broader implications of the SAC on school climate and administrative practices. Findings suggested that SVIs like the SAC contributed to a more positive and inclusive school environment, promoting greater collaboration between students and school staff.

This dissertation examines the dynamics of research-practice partnerships (RPPs) through a qualitative multiple-case study that explores the boundary work between university researchers and K-12 practitioners. It is framed within Wenger’s communities of practice theory and focuses on the concept of ‘boundary work,’ which is pivotal in understanding the collaboration and knowledge exchange in these partnerships. The study is titled “A Tale of Two Brokers” reflecting the critical role of individuals who bridge the divide between academic and practical spheres. It argues that the concept of boundary work is critical in understanding and improving the functioning of RPPs, suggesting that more attention should be paid to the role of brokers in facilitating these partnerships. Key findings reveal that effective boundary work in RPPs is contingent on mutual respect, shared goals, and a deep understanding of each community’s values and practices. The study highlights that while researchers and practitioners often have different priorities and approaches, successful brokers can harmonize these differences to create a productive partnership. These brokers often possess qualities such as flexibility, strong communication skills, and a deep understanding of academic and practical contexts. In conclusion, this study contributes to the broader understanding of how university researchers and K-12 practitioners can effectively collaborate. It underscores the importance of recognizing and nurturing the role of brokers in RPPs, providing valuable lessons for future collaborations between academic researchers and practitioners in various fields.

This multimodal study brought an open, constructively critical challenge to the standard means of process in, and knowledge production from, qualitative inquiry. Using as a context, dyslexia, and the assistive technology lifeworlds of postsecondary students, this study co-partnered with six college students with dyslexia. Co-partnership allowed for an emergence of new awareness that the experience of dyslexia and assistive technology is mediated through innumerable dynamics of interactions with and through the world. Methodologically, the study suggested that it is possible to: (a) situate, center, and validate disability throughout all phases of qualitative inquiry; (b) make the discrete parts of action research more inclusive of disability; (c) reduce physical and intellectual access barriers to qualitative inquiry; and (d) regard as reasonable and rigorous research that is produced by bodies and minds that may not process information in typical ways. Emancipatory action research was used to thread together an understanding of the complexities of self, being, and reality for a marginalized group and how systems, structures, interactions, spaces, and language are superimposed on experiences of disability. The emancipatory spirited study allowed space for co-constructed meaning making through dynamic multimodalities of method including audio-visual data co-constructed through narrative storytelling; an analysis through deep listening and video editing – illuminating ‘bright spots’ in the broader lifeworld perspective of dyslexia and assistive technology. The innovative co-constructed products of the dissertation were a 2-hour film, a researcher reflection video, professional development guides for assistive technology and qualitative inquiry, and a methods chapter as part of an edited book prospectus. By engaging with this study, the audience will experience consciousness raising with respect to disability experience and witness a reclaiming of the voice of that experience through inclusive research. This study offers a transformative perspective for future work by inviting critical consideration and co-construction of meaning of an expanded conceptualization of assistive technology as an embodied, negotiated experience; and increases awareness that diverse bodyminds offer powerful narratives of diversity in the human condition and why that matters. .

This dissertation deals with the confluence of neoliberal and dominant Western social pressures in tension with researchers and educators striving toward a more sustainable world in light of the Anthropocene. Although scientists see the Anthropocene as a problem of human activity and environmental degradation, many social scientists and humanities researchers also see it as a problem with entrenched ways of thought. Current ways of thought complicit in the making of the Anthropocene include centering all thought, control, and agency in the radically individual human, centering science as the only legitimate access to knowledge, and presenting that knowledge as apolitical absolute truth. I engage in research creation activated by the minor gestures of human/nature entanglement in the Anthropocene and the promise of place in environmental and sustainability education. As such, I embark on the invention of a new ecology of practices that takes the process philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead as their guiding foundation. As part of this invention circumventing normative neoliberal and Western logics, I take Ajo, Arizona and the surrounding Sonoran Desert as a partner in more-than-human process inquiry. I live in Ajo and explore the Sonoran Desert for four months of data generation employing basic techniques of ethnography divorced from their neopositivist founding theories. Bodies generated from my entanglement with Ajo and the desert participate in inventing Remixing Data Experiences (RDE), a novel data engagement technique. Through RDE, my more-than-human partners and I create ideas by engaging in arts-based techniques that form multimedia art-workings. The ideas generated include Oasis, Decline, Celebrate, Precarity, and Directions. I respond to each idea through anarchival written texts in a variety of genres including ethnographic memoir, short fiction, essay, ballad, and talk poem. I put these ideas into conversation with current methodological and education literature to illustrate that aesthetic-based inquiry contributes new ways forward in the Anthropocene. These new ways include rhythms of certainty and uncertainty in knowledge creation, participating in reciprocal affective capabilities of bodies in joyful knowing, developing modest abstractions that frequently engage concrete experience, and inclusion of aesthetic experiences in learning and inquiry.