How Expert Nurse Faculty Teach Cue Recognition
Description
ABSTRACTThe purpose of this project was to discover how expert nurse faculty teach noticing
and cue recognition skills to undergraduate nursing students. The current health care
environment is complex, requiring new nurses to apply sound clinical judgment for safe
patient care. New nurses often struggle with the first phase of clinical judgment, which
includes noticing or cue recognition. Nurse educators often say that they teach clinical
judgment skills, however specific guidelines to accomplish this task are limited.
This study employed a qualitative exploratory descriptive design. Expert nursing
faculty (N=18) from across the USA were nominated by peers and participated in semistructured interviews in person or via webinar. Interviews were recorded, transcribed,
verified, and then coded using open and axial coding procedures in a grounded theory
approach. Themes were confirmed by three educators with experience in teaching clinical
judgment.
Fifteen themes emerged. Faculty employed a variety of methods to teach cue
recognition skills. In the clinical setting, faculty reported using orientation to the
environment, Socratic questioning, role modeling, guidance in cue collection, and open
discussion. Faculty teaching in simulation settings reported manipulating cues to reflect
real time consequences of missing cues and manipulating cues based on best available
evidence related to the scenarios.
Authentic clinical environments and human patient simulation provide
opportunities for undergraduate nursing students to learn cue recognition and noticing
skills. However, students need the support of nurse educators to guide their learning and
maintain overall safety. Expert nurse faculty possess a wealth of knowledge in how to teach
clinical judgment. Nurse educators reported using methods suitable across settings and
methods specific to clinical or simulation settings. The methods and strategies that expert
nurse educators reported for supporting students in clinical judgment can be used to build
and refine professional development programs for novice and continuing nurse educators.
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2023
Agent
- Author (aut): Poledna, Mari Christina
- Thesis advisor (ths): Hagler, Debbie
- Thesis advisor (ths): Castro, Felipe
- Committee member: O'Brien, Janet
- Publisher (pbl): Arizona State University