With improvements in automation and system capabilities, human responsibilities in those advanced systems can get more complicated; greater situational awareness and performance may be asked of human agents in roles such as fail-safe operators. This phenomenon of automation improvements requiring more from humans in the loop, is connected to the well-known “paradox of automation”. Unfortunately, humans have cognitive limitations that can constrain a person's performance on a task. If one considers human cognitive limitations when designing solutions or policies for human agents, then better results are possible. The focus of this dissertation is on improving human involvement in planning and execution for Sequential Decision Making (SDM) problems. Existing work already considers incorporating humans into planning and execution in SDM, but with limited consideration for cognitive limitations. The work herein focuses on how to improve human involvement through problems in motion planning, planning interfaces, Markov Decision Processes (MDP), and human-team scheduling. This done by first discussing the human modeling assumptions currently used in the literature and their shortcomings. Then this dissertation tackles a set of problems by considering problem-specific human cognitive limitations --such as those associated with memory and inference-- as well as use lessons from fields such as cognitive ergonomics.