Professional learning communities (PLCs) have become common in many educational settings. A collaborative team (CT) is one component of a PLC. The purpose of this action research study was to examine the impact of a professional development innovation, Project Collaboration, which included a set of on-demand support modules for CTs to support their work and collaborative efforts. This study was a mixed method, action research study using surveys, rubrics, interviews, and the analysis of CT meeting artifacts. Results from Wilcoxon tests concluded there was not a significant difference from the pre to post quantitative data, descriptive statistics indicated there was an increase in the mean scores on both the postsurvey and the post-rubric when compared to the presurvey and the pre-rubric. The participants perceptions of their individual collaboration skills, their team’s collaboration skills, their self-efficacy to collaborate and the team’s collective efficacy to collaborate was positive and it was reflected in the mean scores after using the collaboration modules. Qualitative data indicated that the collaboration modules were used by participants and well received. Implication for future practice and next steps in action research are discussed.

Today’s science education has been highly criticized in the United States despite reform efforts that attempt to promote more wholistic and integrated goals for teaching and learning science, which include both the understanding of key content and the acquisition of scientific skills. Outdoor education may be a means with which to better engage students in science, but educators often find this type of teaching difficult to adopt for a variety of reasons. Nature journaling may be a useful access point to outdoor education for teachers experiencing those barriers. This study examines a six-month implementation of nature journaling activities in a high school Ecology & Animal Behavior course. It was found that students completing nature journaling in this classroom utilized both scientific knowledge and scientific practices in their work, and that instances and depth of these demonstrations increased as a general trend over time, which may be considered successful learning according to situativity theory. Further, students communicated their understanding of what they were accomplishing through their journal work as highly beneficial, though their own perceptions of their competencies in scientific practices did not change. Though additional research needs to be conducted, this study points to a potentially positive relationship between modern science education and outdoor learning through nature journal activities.