Teaching AZ Politics & The State Legislature in SPGS: Simulations in State Politics

Description
Education in state politics is critical for undergraduate students in the School of Politics and Global Studies at Arizona State University. At our four-year universities, the only Arizona state politics courses that are taught are to fill teacher certification requirements.

Education in state politics is critical for undergraduate students in the School of Politics and Global Studies at Arizona State University. At our four-year universities, the only Arizona state politics courses that are taught are to fill teacher certification requirements. This project intends to propose alternative pedagogy to an existing Arizona State University course titled POS 417 - "Arizona Politics". Through reviewing the literature surrounding discipline-based learning, simulations, and active learning findings concluded that students benefit from engagement and active participation in simulated activities, in addition to longer retention of material. In addition to literature, interviews with two former practitioners and responses from a short student attitude survey coincided these findings. Overall, SPGS and Arizona State University would benefit from a simulated Arizona state politics course being available to them.
Date Created
2024-05
Agent

“You need to resign”: The Effects of Social Media Commentary and Gender on Incumbent Candidate Evaluations during Political Campaigns

Description
As social media becomes a dominant tool in political campaigns, it is important to analyze how candidates and voters interact over social media and how this impacts elections. This study aims to uncover whether Instagram comments - a key tool

As social media becomes a dominant tool in political campaigns, it is important to analyze how candidates and voters interact over social media and how this impacts elections. This study aims to uncover whether Instagram comments - a key tool voters use to interact with candidates - have an impact on voters’ perceptions and whether or not there are differences in these impacts based on the gender of the candidate. Due to bias against women in politics, I hypothesize that respondents will evaluate female candidates more harshly than male candidates after viewing negative Instagram comments associated with them. To test this hypothesis, I randomly separated a sample of 435 undergraduate students into four groups. Each group was assigned a hypothetical incumbent Senate candidate (male or female) and shown a candidate biography. The biographies were identical, save for the names/genders of the candidates. Additionally, the two experimental groups were shown negative Instagram comments associated with their candidate. Each group was asked to evaluate their candidate's viability, favorability, competency, leadership ability, and qualifications, in addition to scoring the likelihood that they would vote for them. I found that the male candidate had lower scores than his female counterpart for all six traits evaluated, meaning he was evaluated more harshly. This persisted in both the control and experimental groups, as well as both before and after the stimulus was presented to the experimental groups. However, the respondents’ evaluation scores for the female candidate dropped by a larger margin after viewing the negative comments than the scores for the male candidate did. This persisted for five of the six traits evaluated. Voters’ perceptions, then, are impacted by negative Instagram comments for male and female candidates, although there is some evidence to indicate that they have a larger negative effect on the perceptions of female candidates.
Date Created
2024-05
Agent

“Mr. Vice President, I’m Speaking” An Exploration of Political Ambition, Communication Dynamics, and the Creation of Safe Spaces Among Women in Law

Description
Blending the theoretical foundations of gendered political socialization (Bos et. al 2021) with the distinct communication patterns observed between male and female justices on the United States Supreme Court (Schweers & Jacobi, 2017).– this participant observer study seeks to analyze

Blending the theoretical foundations of gendered political socialization (Bos et. al 2021) with the distinct communication patterns observed between male and female justices on the United States Supreme Court (Schweers & Jacobi, 2017).– this participant observer study seeks to analyze the mechanisms of gendered communication within a unique population of men and women– law students. Throughout this study, I explore the mechanisms that dictate gendered ambition levels within a group of highly ambitious individuals. Additionally, I examine gendered communication patterns and the impact of digital safe spaces in the classroom setting. On the whole, I aim to investigate gendered communication levels within the microcosm of the law school environment to gain a more realistic and granular understanding of the interplay between ambition and gender in the field of law. Overall, I find that women are disproportionately interrupted by men in an attempt to maintain male hegemony, ultimately stifling female voices in the classroom. While the creation of safe spaces for women can begin to mitigate the negative downstream effects of interruption, womens’ ideas, and ultimately female agency, is negatively affected by repeated patterns of male behavior.
Date Created
2023-12
Agent

LGBT+ in Africa: Gay Rights Through the Lenses of Law and Colonialism

Description

The perception that homosexuality is an immoral affliction and an innovation from Western cultures is prevalent throughout Africa, specifically in six case countries: Togo, Nigeria, Senegal, Uganda, Zimbabwe, and Namibia. This thesis seeks to demonstrate that homophobia, not homosexuality, is

The perception that homosexuality is an immoral affliction and an innovation from Western cultures is prevalent throughout Africa, specifically in six case countries: Togo, Nigeria, Senegal, Uganda, Zimbabwe, and Namibia. This thesis seeks to demonstrate that homophobia, not homosexuality, is the true Western import. Additionally, it will analyze the background and colonial histories of my six dossier countries, their current laws surrounding LGBT+ rights, the social and legal repercussions of being LGBT+, and the consequences of state-sponsored homophobia in terms of justice, international law, and the future of each country. Based on my research, all these case countries use colonial-era provisions, penal codes, and religious norms to discriminate against homosexuals, which operate under legally-mandated “morality,” a notion inherently subjective. Additionally, the most targeted groups are gay men and transgender people, while lesbians and bisexual women are rarely targeted and convicted compared to homosexual men. This is due to various social, legal, and religious factors regarding the high importance of patriarchy and masculinity. Ultimately, this thesis concludes that European colonization in Togo, Nigeria, Senegal, Uganda, Zimbabwe, and Namibia introduced new legal norms that persecuted pre-colonial practices of homosexuality under the guise of morality. Now, the repercussions are rampant and dangerous (especially for homosexual men and transgender people) and cannot be overcome without radical changes to local legal and social systems.

Date Created
2023-05
Agent

A Critique of How Capitalists Subvert American Democracy and Limit Free Choice to Acquire Wealth at the Detriment, Repression, and Expansion of the Proletariat

Description

America claims liberal democracy its label, with the American dream, and the electoral fallacy idealized in American society. However, I then debunk the two fallacies: The electoral fallacy which promises democratic free choice through elections, and the fallacy of the

America claims liberal democracy its label, with the American dream, and the electoral fallacy idealized in American society. However, I then debunk the two fallacies: The electoral fallacy which promises democratic free choice through elections, and the fallacy of the American Dream which promises merit-based economic and social climbing within capitalism. These fallacies miss the reality that democracy requires meaningful and impactful exercise of such freedoms, and how the context of capitalism has constrained and seeks to limit this. I argue that the understanding of liberal democracy as simply the exercise of elections deemphasizes the other rights required by a liberal democracy. The negation of the meaningfulness of liberties and free choice, which is promised within a liberal democratic system leaves them open to constraints and lacking protection. I also argue that the installation of capitalism without enough regulation creates ripple effects of the wealth gap so that the power of wealth contaminates the American political system and corrupts how liberal democracy operates in America. More specifically, I present three capitalist-affected realms related to the intersection of liberal democracy and capitalism. First, I argue that capitalism widens the wealth gap and corrupts liberal democracy; elected officials need capitalists' funds to campaign and stay in power. The political freedom to vote and impact policy is limited because wealthy citizens and corporations have more influence than ordinary citizens. Second, I argue that, in the new realm of the internet, capitalists use social media and commodify personal information in order to exploit consumer demand and influence opinions about the capitalist system. Thirdly, I argue that the elite use the media as a tool of social influence for their wide reach of audience and oligopolized structure. They buy these companies to socially manipulate the opinions and behavior of consumers and advance capitalist profits, using it as a cathartic release for the public's grievances. I end with a third section, in which I propose tangible steps to restore the values of liberal democracy in America and better protect the proletariat masses and their interests. For the political concerns, I propose replacing the first-past-the-post voting system with ranked choice voting system in order to elect a representative with the greatest overall support to better represent their population of voters. I also propose greater restrictions on the amount and anonymity of campaign donations, which has been proven to lessen the power of the wealthy on the political system. Then, in order to combat the control of economic decisions by large corporations, I propose we take inspiration from the European Union’s restrictions on the collection/use of personal information: General Data Protection Regulation, Privacy Shield, and the Right to Delisting. Lastly, I advocate for larger, intangible changes to curb the overextension of capitalism’s effects and the subversion of democracy, like education that exposes the veil of American Capitalist Democracy, promotion of a level of responsibility by the privileged, and a shift of values away from profit and control/power to liberal democratic equality.

Date Created
2023-05
Agent

The Power of the Dollar and Constituency: Arizona Clean Elections as Campaign Finance Reform

Description
The Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission was put into effect in 2000 as a new method of campaign finance reform that sought to provide new voices with proper funds to compete with privately financed (traditional) candidates. In theory, the Clean

The Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission was put into effect in 2000 as a new method of campaign finance reform that sought to provide new voices with proper funds to compete with privately financed (traditional) candidates. In theory, the Clean Elections Commission could provide a more equal and more democratic method of handling elections in terms of campaign finance. Though much of its power was stripped away by the Supreme Court in the case, Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, the Commission still exists and provides qualifying candidates with a chance to run that they would not have otherwise and voters with more power to hold politicians accountable. Other work on the topic concerns its effectiveness as campaign finance reform and its ability to properly represent the constituents, though it lacks perspective from those in the political sphere who use or work on publicly funded campaigns. As such, along with my own background research, I interviewed three people who do have more direct experience with the Citizens Clean Elections Commission to determine their outlook on the system in its current and previous states. In doing so, I found that Arizona Clean Elections are not what they used to be and are likely not viable on a wider scale, though they still provide an accessible way to run for office and a method of voters holding their elected officials accountable.
Date Created
2023-05
Agent

What is the intent behind ESA expansion in Arizona?

Description

During the Spring 2022 semester, I had the opportunity to work as a legislative intern for the Arizona Department of Education. While working there, I came into contact with various issues revolving around public education. However, these issues were nothing

During the Spring 2022 semester, I had the opportunity to work as a legislative intern for the Arizona Department of Education. While working there, I came into contact with various issues revolving around public education. However, these issues were nothing compared to the pressing issue of Empowerment Scholarship Accounts (ESAs). ESAs allow state funding to follow a student to whichever school they choose - public schooling, private schooling, or homeschooling. The most significant debate surrounding this issue is whether or not the legislation was created with the intent to help students in their educational pursuits. I noticed that many left-leaning legislators had it in their minds that right-leaning groups supported this legislation with the intent of giving private schools public money. However, right-leaning supporters claim that ESAs are intended to assist needy students when public schools cannot meet their needs. I wanted to pursue my thesis on this topic because as an intern I always wondered which group was correct.

Date Created
2023-05
Agent

Identity at Play

Description

Identity at Play is a creative project inquiry founded in communications theory which delves into how individuals construct their identities and understanding of the world around them, specifically through engagement with Tabletop Roleplay Games. TTRPGs, as they are colloquially known,

Identity at Play is a creative project inquiry founded in communications theory which delves into how individuals construct their identities and understanding of the world around them, specifically through engagement with Tabletop Roleplay Games. TTRPGs, as they are colloquially known, have a variety of attributes that hold a unique capacity for fostering safe identity exploration and development of the self. These attributes– both in gameplay mechanics and communities they foster– allow individuals to feel secure and safe to explore hidden parts of themselves and experiment in new perspectives. Explicitly, the project culminates in six narrated episodes of actual play content and six paired talkback sessions to debrief, creating an immersive and engaging storytelling experience for the audience that exemplifies the inquiry at hand. Over the course of the podcasting series, six participants– five players and one gamemaster– engage with the traditional TTRPG experience and grow together in their understanding of various communications theories.

Date Created
2023-05
Agent

Analyzing the Effects of District Performance and Family Income on Participation in Arizona’s School Tuition Organization Scholarship Programs

Description
Since their inception in 1997, Arizona policymakers have debated the merits of Arizona’s income tax credits for contributions to certified school tuition organizations (STOs), though the programs have grown year over year. This study aims to answer lingering questions about

Since their inception in 1997, Arizona policymakers have debated the merits of Arizona’s income tax credits for contributions to certified school tuition organizations (STOs), though the programs have grown year over year. This study aims to answer lingering questions about the beneficiaries of STO scholarships. First, using publicly available reports from the Arizona Department of Revenue, the Arizona Board of Education, and American Community Survey 5-year estimates, multiple regression analysis indicates a weakly negative relationship between scholarship dollars and family income but no statistically significant effect of public-school quality on scholarship dollars. Second, using data from a survey of parents whose students’ attend Arizona private schools, logistic regression suggests a weakly negative relationship between scholarship utilization and family income, with public school quality having no statistically significant effect on STO scholarship utilization. Moreover, multiple regression analysis again shows a weakly negative relationship between scholarship dollars and family income but no statistically significant relationship between public school quality and scholarship dollars. This paper concludes by offering policy suggestions to improve the accountability of these programs.
Date Created
2022-12
Agent

Disparities Within Disability Representation Among U.S. Elected Officials
(Exploring the Stigma of Congenital Versus Acquired Disability in Electoral Outcomes)

165090-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Using critical disability theory, Foucauldian philosophy, phenomenology and my personal lived experience with a congenital impairment, the purpose of this paper is to explore a relatively unexplored subject, stigma against disability onset at birth, and how this manifests in inequitable

Using critical disability theory, Foucauldian philosophy, phenomenology and my personal lived experience with a congenital impairment, the purpose of this paper is to explore a relatively unexplored subject, stigma against disability onset at birth, and how this manifests in inequitable U.S. electoral outcomes. The scope of the paper is mostly focused on federal U.S. elected officials for two reasons: the high visibility of the position and the ideal standards for an elected official. The U.S. candidates running for federal offices receive the most social attention, drawing from millions of Americans whose views on these candidates determine their electoral success. An analysis of disability representation at this level serves as the best indicator for the stigma held against congenital disability. Additionally, the role of an elected official embodies not just the model citizen but the archetypal human. An exploration of U.S. constituent perspectives on this role in politics suggest social norms locate congenitally disabled people in a particularly marginalized identity. Insights gained from this analysis might allow readers to restructure narrow assumptions about disabled people and what would constitute effective representation.

Date Created
2022-05
Agent