Trace evidence is an essential component of forensic investigations. Anthropogenicmaterials such as fibers and glass have been well studied for use in forensic trace evidence, but the potential use of retroreflective beads found in soils for forensic investigations is largely unexplored. Retroreflective glass beads are tiny spheres mixed into pavement markings to create reflective surfaces to reduce lane departure accidents. Retroreflective glass beads are a potentially new source of trace evidence for forensic investigations. Analysis of the spatial distribution and chemical compositions of retroreflective glass beads recovered from 17 soil samples were analyzed and compared to see if there are striking variations that can distinguish samples by source. Soil samples taken near marked roads showed significantly higher concentrations of glass beads, averaging from 0.18 bead/g of soil sample to 587 beads/g of soil, while soil samples taken near unmarked roads had average range of concentration of 0 bead/g of soil to 0.21 bead/g of soil. Retroreflective glass beads come from pavement markings, thus soil samples near marked roads are expected to have higher concentrations of glass beads. Analysis of spatial distribution of glass beads showed that as sample collection moved further from the road, concentration of glass beads decreased. ICP-MS results of elemental concentrations for each sample showed discriminative differences between samples, for most of the elements. An analysis of variance for elemental concentrations was conducted, and results showed statistically significant differences, beyond random chance alone for half of the elements analyzed. For forensic comparisons, a significant difference in even just one element is enough to conclude that the samples came from different sources. The elemental concentrations of glass beads collected from the same location, but of varying differences, was also analyzed. ANOVA results show significant differences for only one or two elements. A pair-wise t-test was conducted to determine which elements are most discriminative among all the samples. Rubidium was found to be the most discriminative, showing significant difference for 67% of the pairs. Beryllium, potassium, and manganese were also highly discriminative, showing significant difference for at least 50% of all the pairs.