Objectives. The role of parents and caregivers is vital in promoting healthy eating habits among Hispanic adolescents. However, there are inconsistent findings on whether parental feeding practices are beneficial to their diet quality. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of parental feeding practices on adolescent dietary outcomes post-parenting intervention among Hispanic dyads. The present study is a secondary analysis using data from a randomized controlled trial testing the effect of a parenting intervention, Families Preparing the New Generation Plus (FPNG+), on adolescent dietary and substance use outcomes among sixth to seventh grade Hispanic students. Methods. A subsample of dyads (n=78) completed surveys to collect information on parental feeding practices and adolescent dietary outcomes at baseline (T1) and immediately post-FPNG+ intervention (T2). Parents (mean age of 39.7 years; 84.6% female) self-reported their use of parental control, pressure to eat, and food restriction parenting practices at T1. Adolescents (mean age of 12.3 years; 68.2% male) self-reported their consumption of fruits, vegetables, and sugar sweetened beverage (SSB) intake at both T1 and T2. Repeated measures ANOVA were employed to compare changes in adolescent dietary outcomes by each of the three parental feeding practices assessed. Results. Findings showed significant differences in changes in vegetable consumption between adolescents of parents who reported use of control (-0.69 cup equivalents/day; p = 0.018), compared to virtually unchanged vegetable intake among those of parents who reported not using control. There were also significant differences in vegetable intake by food restriction, with a decrease in intake among adolescents whose parents reported not using restriction (-0.65 cup equivalents per day; p = 0.021), compared to a virtually unchanged vegetable intake among the use of restriction group. Dietary outcomes of fruit and sugar from SSB intake were not statistically significant by use of any of the parental feeding practices studied. Conclusion. Findings showed that adolescents whose parents used control and food restriction did not have less favorable changes in vegetable intake compared to those of parents who did not use these practices. More research is needed to determine whether the use of parental feeding practices may be advantageous on the intake of fruits, vegetables, and SSBs among adolescents to advise effective parenting interventions and establish lasting healthy eating habits of Hispanic youth.

This project was designed to evaluate a nutrition educational tool designated to educate high school dancers about the importance of nutrition through collecting feedback from dancers during focus group discussions. The nutrition educational tool was created to be easy to read and understand, while still informing on important topics such as water intake, sleep, food groups, diets, and meal prepping. After giving a presentation of the tool to a group of high school dancers, eleven students from a high school dance team completed a survey answering questions about the tool and then participated in a group discussion that asked guided questions about their perceptions of the material presented and their suggestions for edits. Results showed that overall, the participants found this tool useful, but suggested improvements include missing information on the sleep requirement section, more suggestions for dietary restrictions, and additional details about foods and meal prepping. Overall, students found this tool useful for themselves, but results were mixed about if they would use this information in the future or share it with others. Nutrition is an important topic for high school athletes, especially dancers, and should be taught in order to keep dancers healthy.

Objectives. To determine the association between parental level of acculturation using the Anglo Orientation Subscale (AOS) and the Mexican Orientation Subscale (MOS) derived from the Acculturating Rating Scale for Mexican Americans-II (ARSMA II) and their likelihood of serving green salad, vegetables, fruit, 100% fruit juice, and sugar-sweetened beverages during family meals. Methods. A sample of Hispanic parents of 6th, 7th, or 8th-grade adolescents (n=447; 39.8±6.8 years; 89.7% female) enrolled in a parenting intervention promoting healthy nutrition and substance use prevention. Parents completed baseline surveys to self-report whether they had family meals or not, acculturation-related questions, and the frequency with which they serve green salad, vegetables, fruit, 100% fruit juice, and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) during family meals. Associations between parental acculturation level and their likelihood of serving green salad, vegetables, fruit, 100% fruit juice and sugar-sweetened beverages during meal times were assessed with Spearman’s rank correlations. Results. There was a positive correlation between a higher level of acculturation on the Mexican Orientation Subscale (MOS) scale and the frequency of serving SSB during family meals (p=.006). There was a positive correlation between a higher level of acculturation on the Anglo Orientation Subscale (AOS) with the frequency of parents serving green salad (p=<.001), vegetables (p=<.001), and 100% fruit juice (p=.025) during family meals. Conclusion. Findings suggest that a higher Mexican orientation is associated with serving more sugar-sweetened beverages, and a higher Anglo orientation is associated with serving more green salad, vegetables, and 100% fruit juice to adolescents during family meals. Further research is needed to understand how the association of parental acculturation, home food environment, family meals, and socioeconomic status impact what they serve during family meals to their adolescents. A better understanding of what is served would help develop more evidence-based interventions that could help improve adolescents’ diet, which could help curb down obesity prevalence.

Food shopping practices are important in promoting healthy eating habits. Whereas previous behavioral interventions have assessed the effects of such interventions on parent and child health behaviors and quality, few have examined their impact on food shopping practices. This study used a randomized controlled trial design to investigate the efficacy of Athletes for Life (AFL), a 12-week community-based, family-focused intervention program that targeted physical activity and dietary behavior, on food shopping practices among Latino parents with elementary school-aged children. A total of 140 Latino adults were randomized to the AFL intervention or a wait-list control group. AFL included weekly sessions that focused on nutrition education, meal planning, grocery shopping, and physical activity. Participants completed surveys at baseline and after the 12-week program to assess their frequency of use of healthy food shopping practices (i.e., nutrition facts panel use, ingredients list use, grocery list utilization), and whether they refer to specific nutrients within the nutrition facts panel. Intervention effects on the frequency of use of food shopping practices were analyzed using a logistic binomial regression. Effects on consulting specific nutrients within the nutrition facts panel were analyzed using a Quade’s analysis of covariance. Results showed that there was a significant increase in the utilization of grocery lists (2.45±1.42 vs. 1.64±1.57, p=.011, F=6.664), nutrition facts panels (2.76±1.30 vs. 1.40±1.24, p=<.0001, F=47.128), and ingredients lists (2.79±1.26 vs. 1.58±1.51, p=<.0001, F=20.055) among the intervention group participants. Additionally, participants in the intervention group increased their use of nutrition facts panels to look up individual nutrients, particularly calories (OR=4.162, 95% CI=1.762-9.833, p=.009), carbohydrates (OR=7.889, 95% CI=2.136-29.137, p=.018), protein (OR=12.013, 95% CI=2.479-58.222, p=.018), and sodium (OR=4.247, 95% CI=1.624-11.105, p=.027), compared to baseline use. These findings demonstrate that the AFL intervention program was successful in implementing a positive change among parents, which will presumably allow parents to make improvements in their food shopping behaviors that may in turn have an effect on their home food environment and dietary intake among adults and children within the home.

Latino youth are disproportionately impacted by obesity, prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Pediatric obesity is characterized by abnormal increases in pro-inflammatory markers, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and reductions in anti-inflammatory markers, high molecular weight adiponectin (HMW Adpn) and interleukin-10 (IL-10). Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) is an anti-inflammatory that is positively associated with obesity. IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1 and IL-1ra have been associated with reduced insulin sensitivity and β-cell dysfunction, two central pathophysiologic mediators of glucose intolerance, while HMW Adpn and IL-10 have been associated with increased insulin sensitivity and β-cell function. The United States Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) supported lifestyle intervention as the cornerstone approach for preventing T2D among adults with prediabetes, yet no studies to date have assessed the efficacy of an adapted DPP among Latino youth with prediabetes. In this dissertation, three studies were conducted. The first cross-sectional study among Latino youth with prediabetes and obesity (n=65) demonstrated that MCP-1 (β=-0.001, p=0.027; β=0.03, p=0.033), HMW Adpn (β=0.2, p<0.001; β=-2.2, p=0.018), and IL-1ra (β=-0.03, p=0.006; β=0.09, p=0.009) significantly predicted insulin sensitivity (measured by whole body insulin sensitivity index, WBISI) and glucose tolerance (measured by 2-hr glucose concentrations from an oral glucose tolerance test), respectively. Only HMW Adpn significantly predicted β-cell function, measured by oral disposition index, or oDI (β=0.6, p<0.001). The second study was a randomized control trial that demonstrated the efficacy of lifestyle intervention (INT, n=79) for improving oDI among Latino youth with prediabetes and obesity, compared to a usual care control (UCC, n=38) group. No differences were found for changes in WBISI (Δ0.1, p=0.899) or 2-hr glucose (Δ-7.2, p=0.260) between groups. The third study was a secondary analysis (INT n=46, UCC n=29) that demonstrated no significant effects on IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1, HMW Adpn, IL-10, or IL-1ra (all interactions, p>0.05).

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the influence of tap water safety perceptions on plain water intake (PWI) and hydration status in US Latinx adults. Participants (n=492; age, 28±7 y; 37.4% female) completed an Adapted Survey of Water Issues in Arizona and household watersecurity experience-based scales. A sub-sample (n=55; age, 33±14 y; body mass index, 27.77±6.60 kg·m2) completed dietary recalls on two weekdays and one weekend day via Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool to determine average PWI and total water intake (TWI). A 24-h urine sample was collected on one recall day and analyzed for urine osmolality (UOsm). Binary logistic regression determined odds ratios (OR) for the odds of perceiving tap water to be unsafe. Hierarchical linear regression was employed with 24-h UOsm and PWI as primary outcomes for the sub-sample. Overall, 51.2% of all participants and 52.7% of the sub-sample mistrust their tap water safety. The odds of mistrusting tap water were significantly greater (P<0.05) for each additional favorable perception of bottled over tap water (OR=1.94, 95% CI=1.50, 2.50), each additional negative home tap water experience (OR=1.32, 95% CI=1.12, 1.56), each additional use of alternatives and/or modifications to home tap water (OR=1.25, 95% CI=1.04, 1.51), and decreased water quality and acceptability (OR=1.21, 95% CI=1.01, 1.45). The odds of mistrusting tap water were significantly lower (P<0.05) for those whose primary source of drinking water is the public supply (municipal) (OR=0.07, 95% CI=0.01, 0.63) and for those with decreased water access (OR=0.56, 95% CI=0.48, 0.66). There were no differences (n=55, P>0.05) in TWI (2,678±1,139 mL), PWI (1,357±971), or 24-h UOsm (460±234 mosm·kg-1). Tap water safety perceptions did not significantly explain variance in PWI or 24-h UOsm (P > 0.05). In conclusion, Latinx mistrust in tap water safety is prevalent. Mistrust appears to be influenced by organoleptic perceptions and to lead to reliance on alternatives to the home drinking water system. Perceptions of tap water safety do not appear to be related to PWI, TWI, or hydration status in Latinx adults.

Objectives. To determine how health-related conversations between parents and their adolescent children are associated with mealtime media device use by adolescents. Methods. A sample of Hispanic parents (n=344; 40.4 ± 6.6 years; 89.2% female) of 6th, 7th, or 8th-grade adolescents enrolled in a parenting intervention promoting healthy nutrition and substance use prevention. Parents completed baseline surveys to self-report the frequency with which they had health- or weight-related conversations with their adolescent child, and the frequency with which the adolescent used media devices during mealtimes (television/movie watching, cellphone use/texting, hand-held gaming devices, listening to music with headphones). Associations between health-related conversations and mealtime media devices were assessed with Spearman’s rank correlations. Chi-square tests and crosstabs were used to identify differences in parents setting limits on media use during mealtime depending on adolescent gender. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare the frequency of health- and weight-related conversations and media device use during mealtime based on adolescent gender. Results. Reported conversations about healthy eating, being physically active, and general weight of the adolescent were not associated with reported use of media devices by adolescents during mealtimes. Having conversations related to the adolescent weighing too much was positively and significantly correlated with television/movie watching (r=0.213; p<0.001), talking on a cellphone (r=0.119; p=0.034), using hand-held gaming devices (r=0.131; p=0.022), and listening to music with headphones (r=0.129; p=0.022). Having conversations about exercising to lose weight was also significantly correlated with television/movie watching during mealtimes (r=0.134; p=0.017). Parents reported having more frequent conversations about weighing too much with males when compared to adolescent females (2.45 ± 1.43 vs. 1.93 ± 1.28; t-stat= 3.58; p=0.005). Parents also reported more frequent weight-related conversations overall (weight-related scale) with males when compared to female adolescents (2.73 ± 1.39 vs 2.52 ± 1.26; t-stat=1.51; p=0.024). Conclusion. Findings suggest that higher frequency of weight-related conversation is associated with higher usage of media devices during mealtimes. Whether parenting practices, parental concerns about their children’s weight, and the home mealtime environment play a role on adolescent weight status in Hispanic households warrants further investigation.

Objectives. This study primarily explored the relationship between family meal frequency and youth intake of fruits and vegetables (FV) and added sugar from sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in a population of Latinx parents and their middle school children. The study secondarily explored factors influencing family meal frequency; specifically, whether parent education level, income level, acculturation level, and food insecurity are associated with family meal frequency.

Methods. Latinx parents and their 6th-8th grade children were recruited from eligible middle schools in Maricopa County to participate in a larger intervention study. A sample of parent-youth dyads from the first cohort of the larger study was selected for cross-sectional analysis of baseline data in this study (n=124). Participants completed a survey requesting demographics, family meal habits, and dietary intake. Participants were asked to report annual income, education level, and number of family meals in the home in the past week. They were also asked to complete an Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans, a 6-item Household Food Security Questionnaire, and a 26-question Dietary Screener Questionnaire. Analyses were run using Spearman’s Rank Correlation test and a Chi Square test of Independence.

Results. Mean daily youth intake of FV was 2.7 ± 1.4 cup equivalents, and daily youth intake of sugars from SSBs was 8.6 ± 4.9 teaspoon equivalents per day. Fifty percent of parents reported 7 or more family meals per week, while 38.7% reported 3-6 family meals per week and 11.3% reported 2 or fewer family meals per week. There was no significant association between family meal frequency and youth FV (r=-0.154; p=0.256) or added sugar from SSBs (r=0.027; p=0.807) intake. Similarly, results from Chi Square analyses suggested there was no association between family meal frequency and parent income level (p=0.392), Mexican-oriented acculturation level (p=0.591), Anglo-oriented acculturation level (p=0.052) and food insecurity (p=0.754). In contrast, a significant association between parent education and family meal frequency was found (p=0.014).

Conclusions. Parent education may play a role in shaping family meal practices in Latinx families. More research is needed to further understand this relationship and the relationship between family meal habits and youth dietary intake.