As Arizona State University moves toward virtual classroom accessibility and the fortification of education for all students around the globe (ASU Online), we must continue to develop and cultivate creative resources to bring STEM laboratory activities to those who do not have access to the resources found in many classrooms. Online science degree programs face a particular challenge, as laboratory activities must be reformatted and rethought for virtual application. ASU has recently launched an online Forensic Science major, and the ability to identify and analyze evidence at a crime scene is one of the most important skills a student-investigator can learn. The development of creative ways to address instruction in a virtual crime scene is essential to the success of this and similar programs. Through the process of identifying evidence, students can hone their critical thinking skills, as they are required to assess scenarios and decide which evidence is pertinent to a given case. By making decisions regarding the packaging of identified evidence, students learn important steps in any forensic job, such as chain of custody, the effects of material packaging on evidence preservation, and the ramifications of incorrect evidence handling. Currently, there are several virtual crime scene programs available for purchase (Crime Scenes Meet Virtual Reality | St. Edward’s University in Austin, Texas). These programs offer activities such as those described above, yet they present a financial hurdle and are not customizable for specific courses or environments. Through the use of Google Slides, this project yielded an accessible and easily replicable interactive learning experience. The project resulted in a virtual crime scene that was both intuitive and integrative of generally novice technological resources such as Google Enterprise. Clickable photo slides were constructed using the linked shape imagery tools on Google Slides in order to provide an immersive learning experience.

Determining post-mortem interval (PMI), or time since death, is a crucial part of the forensic investigation process. However, there is not currently a reliable method of estimation that can be universally used in the field. The goal of this study was to analyze the most commonly used statistical methods of PMI estimation and attempt to improve these methods, particularly for a desert environment, through an assessment of variables collected through the Sonoran Desert Decomposition Project at ASU.

Forensic pathology is a critical science that bridges medicine and law. A forensic pathologist conducts autopsies to determine the cause and manner of an individual’s death, which is helpful in solving forensic cases and criminal cases and discovering hereditary diseases. They are also responsible for contacting family members or next of kin of the deceased and for presenting their findings or conclusions in court. Although forensic pathology is a vital field in science and law, there is a national deficiency of active forensic pathologists. This may be due to the lack of awareness given to the health and wellness of the workforce, which is at risk in a high stress-inducing work environment. Forensic pathologists are consistently subjected to stress due to overwhelming caseloads and a lack of adequate staffing. While there have been studies conducted in the United States to examine occupational stress and potential coping mechanisms, these reports focus on forensic scientists and not forensic pathologists specifically who may be more likely to develop stress due to their direct work with death. In order to identify what work-related factors cause forensic pathologists the most stress and how have they chosen to cope with their stress, I conducted a survey collecting both qualitative and quantitative data. After completing the study, I identified workload, inadequate staff, dissatisfaction with administration, court processes, and lack of time to complete duties as the most recurring themes of stress, which are supported by the quantitative analysis as well. The coping mechanisms most often mentioned by the participants include exercise, time with family and friends, communicating their stress, complete separation from work, and media use. After identifying these stressor and coping strategies, the participants of the study listed potential practices or programs that could be instated in order to mitigate workplace stress. From this study, suggestions can be made to medical examiner offices that are seeking to improve employee wellness and potentially adopt stress reduction programs in the workplace.