Nitrate (NO3- ) and selenate (SeO42-) are common contaminants found in mining wastewater. Biological treatment has proved successful using bacteria capable of respiring NO3- into nitrogen gas and SeO42- into Se°. The Membrane Biofilm Reactor (MBfR) utilizes biofilm communities on the surface of hollow-fiber membranes to transform oxidized water contaminants into innocuous reduced products. For this project, I set up two MBfRs in a lead and lag configuration to reduce NO3- [input at ~40-45 mg NO3-N/L] and SeO42- [0.62 mg/L], while avoiding sulfate (SO42-) [~1600-1660 mg/L] reduction. Over the course of three experimental phases, I controlled two operating conditions: the applied hydrogen pressure and the total electron acceptor loading. NO3- in the lead MBfR showed average reductions of 50%, 94%, and 91% for phases I, II, and III, respectively. In the lag MBfR, NO3- was reduced by 40%, 96%, and 100% for phases I, II, and III. NO2- was formed in Stage I when NO3- was not reduced completely; nevertheless NO2- accumulation was absent for the remainder of operation. In the lead MBfR, SeO42- was reduced by 65%, 87%, and 50% for phases I, II, and III. In the lag MBfR, SeO42- was reduced 60%, 27%, and 23% for phases I, II, and III. SO42- was not reduced in either MBfR. Biofilm communities were composed of denitrifying bacteria Rhodocyclales and Burkholderiales, Dechloromonas along with the well-known SeO42--reducing Thauera were abundant genera in the biofilm communities. Although SO42- reduction was suppressed, sulfate-reducing bacteria were present in the biofilm. To optimize competition for electron donor and space in the biofilm, optimal operational conditions were hydrogen pressures of 26 and 7 psig and total electron acceptor loading of 3.8 and 3.4 g H2/m2 day for the lead and lag MBfR, respectively.

We studied the microbial community structure of pilot two-stage membrane biofilm reactors (MBfRs) designed to reduce nitrate (NO[subscript 3]–) and perchlorate (ClO[subscript 4]–) in contaminated groundwater. The groundwater also contained oxygen (O[subscript 2]) and sulfate (SO[2 over 4]–), which became important electron sinks that affected the NO[subscript 3]– and ClO[subscript 4]– removal rates. Using pyrosequencing, we elucidated how important phylotypes of each “primary” microbial group, i.e., denitrifying bacteria (DB), perchlorate-reducing bacteria (PRB), and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), responded to changes in electron-acceptor loading. UniFrac, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), and diversity analyses documented that the microbial community of biofilms sampled when the MBfRs had a high acceptor loading were phylogenetically distant from and less diverse than the microbial community of biofilm samples with lower acceptor loadings. Diminished acceptor loading led to SO[2 over 4]– reduction in the lag MBfR, which allowed Desulfovibrionales (an SRB) and Thiothrichales (sulfur-oxidizers) to thrive through S cycling. As a result of this cooperative relationship, they competed effectively with DB/PRB phylotypes such as Xanthomonadales and Rhodobacterales. Thus, pyrosequencing illustrated that while DB, PRB, and SRB responded predictably to changes in acceptor loading, a decrease in total acceptor loading led to important shifts within the “primary” groups, the onset of other members (e.g., Thiothrichales), and overall greater diversity.

Water contamination with nitrate (NO3−) (from fertilizers) and perchlorate (ClO4−) (from rocket fuel and explosives) is a widespread environmental problem. I employed the Membrane Biofilm Reactor (MBfR), a novel bioremediation technology, to treat NO3− and ClO4− in the presence of naturally occurring sulfate (SO42−). In the MBfR, bacteria reduce oxidized pollutants that act as electron acceptors, and they grow as a biofilm on the outer surface of gas-transfer membranes that deliver the electron donor (hydrogen gas, (H2). The overarching objective of my research was to achieve a comprehensive understanding of ecological interactions among key microbial members in the MBfR when treating polluted water with NO3− and ClO4− in the presence of SO42−. First, I characterized competition and co-existence between denitrifying bacteria (DB) and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) when the loading of either the electron donor or electron acceptor was varied. Then, I assessed the microbial community structure of biofilms mostly populated by DB and SRB, linking structure with function based on the electron-donor bioavailability and electron-acceptor loading. Next, I introduced ClO4− as a second oxidized contaminant and discovered that SRB harm the performance of perchlorate-reducing bacteria (PRB) when the aim is complete ClO4− destruction from a highly contaminated groundwater. SRB competed too successfully for H2 and space in the biofilm, forcing the PRB to unfavorable zones in the biofilm. To better control SRB, I tested a two-stage MBfR for total ClO4− removal from a groundwater highly contaminated with ClO4−. I document successful remediation of ClO4− after controlling SO4 2− reduction by restricting electron-donor availability and increasing the acceptor loading to the second stage reactor. Finally, I evaluated the performance of a two-stage pilot MBfR treating water polluted with NO3− and ClO4−, and I provided a holistic understanding of the microbial community structure and diversity. In summary, the microbial community structure in the MBfR contributes to and can be used to explain/predict successful or failed water bioremediation. Based on this understanding, I developed means to manage the microbial community to achieve desired water-decontamination results. This research shows the benefits of looking "inside the box" for "improving the box".