Stereolithography (SLA) is an innovative additive manufacturing technique that has gained immense popularity in recent times due to its ability to produce complex and precise three-dimensional objects. However, the quality of the final product depends on the stability and homogeneity of the photocurable metallic ink used, which is crucial for manufacturing high-quality parts with good surface finish and higher density. To achieve homogeneity in the photocurable metallic resin, the study conducted on optimizing the printing ink for ultrafast layer less fabrication of 3D metal objects investigated the effectiveness of different dispersants such as KH 560, Triton X-100, BYK 2013, BYK 2030, and BYK 111. The use of dispersants plays a vital role in optimizing the ink and enhancing the surface finish and density of the final product. The rheology results showed that the appropriate dispersant has the potential to improve the properties of the printing ink and benefit the integrity of the printed green bodies and their surface finish. By using the optimized suspension, the study was able to fabricate parts with high metallic loading at an ultrafast speed using the Continuous Liquid Interface Production technique. FTIR analysis, sedimentation testing, and rheology study has been carried out which demonstrates the effects of the utilization of various dispersants optimally to improve the homogeneity and manufactured part’s integrity. Power law has been used to understand the viscosity behavior of dispersants in a photocurable ink with copper sulfate keeping the parameters such as shearing rate, stress, and torque intact. The microscopic images of the sintered parts showed high precision and an extremely smooth surface finish, which underscores the technique's potential to produce high-quality 3D metal objects. The solubility of dispersants significantly influenced the structural quality after washing and debinding processes. This study provides valuable information to design photocurable metallic suspensions for metal salts like copper sulfate pentahydrate.

High-Density polyethylene (HDPE) is the most used polymer on earth. Since it is used in such large quantities, it has become the most extensively produced polymer on the planet. Unfortunately, the rate of reusing or recycling HDPE is far behind the rate of production leading to plastic pollution. Most of this waste plastic ends up in landfills or incineration to recover energy. Plastic production consumes a lot of energy and is associated with CO2 emissions. This method of disposing plastic only adds to the environmental pollution rather than improving it. Primary reasons for low recycling rate appear to be more political and financial. In the US, the rate of recycling was less than 10% whereas Japan showed a recycling rate of more than 80%. The other aspect of low recycling is financial. In order to make recycling a financially viable process, efforts have to be made to streamline the process of waste collection, segregation and technically feasible process. This study focusses on the technical aspect of the issue. Even though efforts have been made to recycle HDPE, none of the processes have been recycle HDPE with financial viability, recovering full value of plastic, minimum CO2 emissions and minimum change in properties of the polymer. This study focusses on effective recycling of HDPE with minimum change in its properties. Dissolution has been used to dissolve the polymer selectively and then reprecipitating the polymer using a non-solvent to obtain the polymer grains. This is followed by mixing additives to the polymer grains to minimize degradation of the polymer during the extrusion process. The polymer is then extruded in an extruder beyond its melting temperature. This process is repeated for 5 cycles. After each cycle, the polymer is tested for its properties using the Tensile Testing, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), and Dynamic Mechanicalii Analysis (DMA). It was observed that the rheological properties of the polymer were maintained after the 5th recycle whereas the mechanical properties deteriorated after the 2nd recycle. Also, increase in carbonyl index was observed after 5th recycle.