Despite theoretical models predicting that signals should only evolve if they convey honest information, dishonest signals may persist. Interestingly, crustaceans have been crucial in furthering biologists understanding of how and why dishonest signals persist; because many crustaceans wield claws that function as dishonest signals. For example, male fiddler crabs have claws that grow to large sizes but are incapable of inflicting severe damage to opponents, thus acting as a dishonest signal of their strength. Although initial work suggested that dishonest signaling was common throughout Crustacea, biologists understanding of the generality of dishonest communication is lacking. To resolve these issues, I combined morphological, behavioral, and comparative studies to investigate whether crayfish engage in dishonest communication. First, I found that regenerated claws in virile crayfish (Faxonius virilis) produce 40% weaker pinching forces compared to original claws. These results suggest that claw regeneration in crayfish may be the functional mechanism that produces dishonest signals. Second, I conducted two studies that investigated what traits determine dominance in staged contests; one on intrasexual contests in both male and female F. virilis, and a second between intra- and interspecific contests between male F. virilis and male red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). In both studies, I did not find support the hypothesis that large but weak claws function as dishonest signals; because claw size did not predict the outcome of signaling interactions and claw strength did not predict the outcome of physical fights. Lastly, I conducted a comparative study between six species of crayfish — three stream-dwelling species that use their claws as weapons and signals, and three burrowing species that use their claws for excavating burrows. Despite all six species possessing claws that unreliably predicted claw strength, I found no support for the hypothesis that their claws function as dishonest signals in any of these species. Thus, my dissertation results suggest that despite having claws that unreliably predict their strength, such unreliable signals do not equate to dishonest signals. Altogether, my work highlights the importance of collecting behavioral data in studies of dishonest communication and stresses the importance of separating unreliable signals from dishonest signals.