Adaptability has emerged as an essential skill in the engineering workforce due to constant technological and social change, engineering grand challenges, and the recent global pandemic. Although engineering employers and national reports have called for increased adaptability among engineers, what adaptability means in the engineering workplace has not been investigated. This dissertation uses qualitative semi-structured critical incident interviews with engineering managers from four corporations to better understand their perceptions of adaptability and then incorporates these findings into a scenario-based intervention for the engineering classroom. Thematic analysis of the interviews with engineering managers expanded existing frameworks for workplace adaptability to provide an engineering-specific understanding of adaptability as a construct. Managers’ perceptions of adaptability span six dimensions, each important when teaching this competency to engineering students: Creative Problem Solving; Interpersonal Adaptability; Handling Work Stress; Dealing with Uncertain and Unpredictable Situations; Learning New Technologies, Tasks, and Procedures; and Cultural Adaptability. Managers’ beliefs about the importance of a balanced approach to being adaptable in different work contexts, and the influence of personal characteristics such as self-awareness and having had specific experiences related to being adaptable, emerged from the findings as well. Composite narratives reflecting real-life situations encountered by engineers in the workplace were developed based on findings from the engineering manager interviews to provide greater texture to the data. Six of the narratives mapped to the six dimensions of adaptability identified in the thematic analysis, while the seventh narrative illustrated the importance of balance and context when deciding whether and how to be adaptable. They revealed how multiple dimensions of adaptability work together and that contextual factors like support from managers and coworkers are integral to an engineer’s adaptability. The narratives were condensed into two scenarios for use in a classroom-based intervention with first-year engineering students at a large public university. After the intervention, many students’ definitions of adaptability became more multi-dimensional and reflective of adaptability context and balance. Students also reported a better understanding of engineering work, an expanded definition of adaptability, greater delineation of adaptability, increased self-awareness, greater appreciation for the importance of adaptability balance, and enhanced feelings of job preparedness.

Prior research has provided evidence to suggest that veterans exhibit unique assets that benefit them in engineering education and engineering industry. However, there is little evidence to determine whether their assets are due to military service or other demographic factors such as age, maturity, or gender. The aim of this study is to discover, better understand, and disseminate the unique assets that veterans gained through military service and continue to employ as engineering students or professional engineers. This strength-based thematic analysis investigated the semi-structured narrative interviews of 18 military veterans who are now engineering students or professionals in engineering industry. Using the Funds of Knowledge framework, veterans’ Funds of Knowledge were identified and analyzed for emergent themes. Participants exhibited 10 unique veterans’ Funds of Knowledge. Utilizing analytical memos, repeated reflection, and iterative analysis, two overarching themes emerged, Effective Teaming in Engineering and Adapting to Overcome Challenges. Additionally, a niche concept of Identity Crafting was explored using the unique narratives of two participants. This study provides empirical evidence of military veterans experientially learning valuable assets in engineering from their military service. A better understanding of the veterans’ Funds of Knowledge presented in this study provides valuable opportunities for their utilization in engineering education and engineering industry.