The Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) is primarily endemic in five countries, with India and Sudan having the highest burden. The risk factors associated with VL are either unknown in some regions or vary drastically among empirical studies. Here, a dynamical model, motivated and informed by field data from the literature, is analyzed and employed to identify and quantify the impact of region dependent risks on the VL transmission dynamics. Parameter estimation procedures were developed using model-derived quantities and empirical data from multiple resources. The dynamics of VL depend on the estimates of the control reproductive number, RC, interpreted as the average number of secondary infections generated by a single infectious individual during the infectious period. The distribution of RC was estimated for both India (with mean 2.1 ± 1.1) and Sudan (with mean 1.45 ± 0.57). This suggests that VL can be established in naive regions of India more easily than in naive regions of Sudan. The parameter sensitivity analysis on RC suggests that the average biting rate and transmission probabilities between host and vector are among the most sensitive parameters for both countries. The comparative assessment of VL transmission dynamics in both India and Sudan was carried out by parameter sensitivity analysis on VL-related prevalences (such as prevalences of asymptomatic hosts, symptomatic hosts, and infected vectors). The results identify that the treatment and symptoms’ developmental rates are parameters that are highly sensitive to VL symptomatic and asymptomatic host prevalence, respectively, for both countries. It is found that the estimates of transmission probability are significantly different between India (from human to sandflies with mean of 0.39 ± 0.12; from sandflies to human with mean 0.0005 ± 0.0002) and Sudan (from human to sandflies with mean 0.26 ± 0.07; from sandflies to human with mean 0.0002 ± 0.0001). The results have significant implications for elimination. An increasing focus on elimination requires a review of priorities within the VL control agenda. The development of systematic implementation of con­trol programs based on identified risk factors (such as monitoring of asymptomatically infected individuals) has a high transmission-blocking potential.