Description
I examined how competition affects the way animals use thermal resources to control their body temperature. Currently, biologists use a cost benefit analysis to predict how animals should regulate their body temperature. This current theory of thermoregulation does not adequately predict how animals thermoregulate in the wild. While the model works well for animals in low cost habitats, it does not work as well for animals in high cost habitats. For example, animals that are in habitats of low thermal quality thermoregulate more precisely than predicted by the current model. One reason these predictions may be wrong is that they do not account for interactions between animals. By including these interactions in future predictions, a more accurate model of thermoregulatory behavior can be created.
Before developing a theory for all animals, a model needs to be developed for a single model animal, such as fruit flies, that can be used to empirically examine how organisms thermoregulate under competition. My work examines how flies behave around other flies and develops a game theory model predicting how they should optimally behave. More specifically, my research accounts for competition among larvae by using game theory to predict how mothers should select sites when laying eggs. Although flies prefer to lay their eggs in places that will offer suitable temperatures for the development of their larvae, these sites become less suitable when crowded. Therefore, at some density of eggs, cooler sites should become equally beneficial to larvae when considering both temperature and competition. Given this tradeoff, an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) emerges where some flies should lay eggs in cooler sites while other flies should lay eggs at the warmer temperature. By looking at the fitness of genotypes in habitats of differing quality (competition, temperature, food quality, space), I modeled the ESS for flies laying eggs in a heterogeneous environment. I then tested these predictions by observing how flies compete for patches with different temperatures.
Before developing a theory for all animals, a model needs to be developed for a single model animal, such as fruit flies, that can be used to empirically examine how organisms thermoregulate under competition. My work examines how flies behave around other flies and develops a game theory model predicting how they should optimally behave. More specifically, my research accounts for competition among larvae by using game theory to predict how mothers should select sites when laying eggs. Although flies prefer to lay their eggs in places that will offer suitable temperatures for the development of their larvae, these sites become less suitable when crowded. Therefore, at some density of eggs, cooler sites should become equally beneficial to larvae when considering both temperature and competition. Given this tradeoff, an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) emerges where some flies should lay eggs in cooler sites while other flies should lay eggs at the warmer temperature. By looking at the fitness of genotypes in habitats of differing quality (competition, temperature, food quality, space), I modeled the ESS for flies laying eggs in a heterogeneous environment. I then tested these predictions by observing how flies compete for patches with different temperatures.
Download count: 1
Details
Title
- The Younger Games: Flies Compete for Oviposition Sites that Benefit Their Young
Contributors
- Borchert, Jason (Author)
- Angilletta Jr., Michael (Thesis advisor)
- Pratt, Stephen (Committee member)
- Harrison, Jon (Committee member)
- DeNardo, Dale (Committee member)
- Mitchell, William (Committee member)
- Arizona State University (Publisher)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2018
Subjects
Resource Type
Collections this item is in
Note
-
Doctoral Dissertation Biology 2018