Description
Extremely thick cranial vaults have been noted as a diagnostic characteristic of Homo erectus since the first fossil of the species was identified, but potential mechanisms underlying this seemingly unique trait have not been rigorously investigated. Cranial vault thickness (CVT) is not a monolithic trait, and the responsiveness of its layers to environmental stimuli is unknown. Identifying factors that affect CVT would be exceedingly valuable in teasing apart potential contributors to thick vaults in the Pleistocene. Four hypotheses were tested using CT scans of skulls of more than 1100 human and non-human primates. Data on total frontal, parietal, and occipital bone thickness and bone composition were collected to test the hypotheses: H1. CVT is an allometric consequence of brain or body size. H2. Thick cranial vaults are a response to long, low cranial vault shape. H3. High masticatory stress causes localized thickening of cranial vaults. H4. Activity-mediated systemic hormone levels affect CVT. Traditional comparative methods were used to identify features that covary with CVT across primates to establish behavior patterns that might correlate with thick cranial vaults. Secondly, novel experimental manipulation of a model organism, Mus musculus, was used to evaluate the relative plasticity of CVT. Finally, measures of CVT in fossil hominins were described and discussed in light of the extant comparative and experimental results. This dissertation reveals previously unknown variation among extant primates and humans and illustrates that Homo erectus is not entirely unique among primates in its CVT. The research suggests that it is very difficult to make a mouse grow a thick head, although it can be genetically programmed to have one. The project also identifies a possible hominin synapomorphy: high diploë ratios compared to non-human primates. It also found that extant humans differ from non-human primates in overall pattern of which cranial vault bones are thickest. What this project was unable to do was definitively provide an explanation for why and how Homo erectus grew thick skulls. Caution is required when using CVT as a diagnostic trait for Homo erectus, as the results presented here underscore the complexity inherent in its evolution and development.
Download count: 9
Details
Title
- Comparative and experimental investigations of cranial robusticity in mid-Pleistocene hominins
Contributors
- Copes, Lynn (Author)
- Kimbel, William H. (Thesis advisor)
- Schwartz, Gary T (Committee member)
- Spencer, Mark A. (Committee member)
- Ravosa, Matthew J. (Committee member)
- Arizona State University (Publisher)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2012
Subjects
- Physical anthropology
- Evolution & development
- Physiology
- Allometry
- bone physiology
- experimental animal models
- Homo erectus
- skeletal robusticity
- Craniology
- Homo erectus--Morphology.
- Homo erectus
- Homo erectus--Physiology.
- Homo erectus
- Primates--Morphology.
- Primates
- Primates--Physiology.
- Skull--Physiology.
- Skull
Resource Type
Collections this item is in
Note
-
thesisPartial requirement for: Ph.D., Arizona State University, 2012
-
bibliographyIncludes bibliographical references (p. 564-606)
-
Field of study: Anthropology
Citation and reuse
Statement of Responsibility
by Lynn Copes