Comparative Osteology and Morphometrics of the Caudal Axial Skeleton in Anolis carolinensis and Anolis sagrei

Anole lizards that inhabit the islands and mainland of the Caribbean basin have evolved morphological traits adapted to the microhabitat that they occupy. The anoles on these islands have been characterized as "ecomorphs" or morphologically and behaviorally-adapted groups, including: crown-giant, trunk-crown, trunk, grass-bush, twig, and trunk-ground. Ecomorphs display morphological features that are specifically adapted to the habitat that the anole occupies. One key morphological difference is tail length. While the anoles Anolis carolinensis and A. sagrei have similar ratios of tail length versus snout-to-vent length (SVL), they occupy different microhabitats. Specifically, A. carolinensis inhabits trunk-crown habitats while A. sagrei is found in trunk-ground regions. In this study, I focused on analysis of the caudal vertebrae of these two species, to determine if the structure of the osteological elements reflected differences in microhabitat adaptation. Skeletal preparations reveal that A. carolinensis have 40 \u2014 46 caudal vertebrae, and A. sagrei have 38 \u2014 49 caudal vertebrae. Transverse processes are present in Ca1-8 in A. carolinensis whereas transverse processes in A. sagrei span from Ca1-42 vertebrae. Ca6\u201440 have autotomy planes in A. sagrei, whereas only Ca8\u201417 have autotomy planes in A. carolinensis. These findings indicate that A. carolinensis are limited in the ability to autotomize their tail compared to A. sagrei. A. carolinensis, living higher in the trees than A. sagrei, might incur a greater impairment of locomotor function if autotomized. There appears to be no differences between males and females of both species in respect to vertebrae lengths. Differences between A. carolinensis and A. sagrei in terms of vertebral length are found in Ca12-15, 29-30, 34, and 37. The finding indicates that almost all caudal vertebrae between A. carolinensis and A. sagrei have similar relative lengths, but seven vertebrae have statistically significant differences. The biological significance of the findings is not clear, but functional and myological studies may help elucidate the reason of the observed differences.