Description
Contributing to the small but growing body of research on linguistic discrimination in legal settings, this thesis conducts a sociolinguistic investigation of the impact of an individual's accent on juror perceptions of defendant favorability and innocence. The study used an online questionnaire in which sixty mock jurors were each asked to evaluate the audio testimony of a defendant representing one of three English ethnolects: African American, British South African, or Caucasian American. In addition to rating the defendant's persuasiveness, honesty, credibility, trustworthiness, and guilt, participants were also asked to determine an appropriate punishment (if any) for the defendant. Results indicate a preference of participants to issue an unsure or caveat opinion for the African American speaker but not to the British South African or Caucasian American speaker. The implications of these findings, as well as the correlations between each variable are discussed. The paper concludes with a recommendation for legal training and a revision of courtroom practices.
Details
Title
- Perceptual Dialectology: Accents and Jury Verdicts
Contributors
- Maerowitz, Max Robert (Author)
- Prior, Matthew (Thesis director)
- Adams, Karen (Committee member)
- Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
- School of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies (Contributor)
- Department of English (Contributor)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2014-05
Subjects
Resource Type
Collections this item is in