Description
Abstract
According to the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), approximately 37 million Americans suffer from some degree of hearing loss, which impacts their ability to communicate fluently with the hearing world. This number includes up to 17% of the adult population, many who have experienced post-lingual or late-deafness. While hearing loss is known to be one of the most prevalent chronically disabling sensory conditions, little is known about the impact it has on individuals’ cultural identity and sense of well-being. There is somewhat of a deficit in the research literature addressing these issues of cultural identity, especially as it relates to post-lingually deaf adults. Improved knowledge of these dimensions of hearing loss is needed—a knowledge which could lead to more effective resources for late-deafened people. Though hearing loss can be disabling, access to American Sign Language and the Deaf culture may compensate for social and cultural loss and potentially improve well-being within late-deafened individuals. Using the framework of Social Identity Theory and Neil Glickman’s Deaf Identity Development model, this study sought to identify late-deafened adults who fall into the marginal category, placing them at greater risk of becoming socially marginalized and experiencing diminished well-being. Subjective well-being was then measured by the Flourishing Scale to determine how being socially marginal may impact one’s sense of self, personal prosperity, social efficacy, and sense of social competency. Results showed that marginal individuals do experience diminished subjective well-being, a fact which should be further explored by researchers, especially in the context of developing more effective interventions and services for late-deafened individuals.
According to the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), approximately 37 million Americans suffer from some degree of hearing loss, which impacts their ability to communicate fluently with the hearing world. This number includes up to 17% of the adult population, many who have experienced post-lingual or late-deafness. While hearing loss is known to be one of the most prevalent chronically disabling sensory conditions, little is known about the impact it has on individuals’ cultural identity and sense of well-being. There is somewhat of a deficit in the research literature addressing these issues of cultural identity, especially as it relates to post-lingually deaf adults. Improved knowledge of these dimensions of hearing loss is needed—a knowledge which could lead to more effective resources for late-deafened people. Though hearing loss can be disabling, access to American Sign Language and the Deaf culture may compensate for social and cultural loss and potentially improve well-being within late-deafened individuals. Using the framework of Social Identity Theory and Neil Glickman’s Deaf Identity Development model, this study sought to identify late-deafened adults who fall into the marginal category, placing them at greater risk of becoming socially marginalized and experiencing diminished well-being. Subjective well-being was then measured by the Flourishing Scale to determine how being socially marginal may impact one’s sense of self, personal prosperity, social efficacy, and sense of social competency. Results showed that marginal individuals do experience diminished subjective well-being, a fact which should be further explored by researchers, especially in the context of developing more effective interventions and services for late-deafened individuals.
Details
Title
- Deaf Identity Development and Subjective Well-Being in Late-Deafened Individuals
Contributors
- Blech, Jennifer Grace (Author)
- Almasan, Oana (Thesis director)
- Wutich, Amber (Committee member)
- School of Human Evolution & Social Change (Contributor)
- School of Politics and Global Studies (Contributor)
- Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2019-12
Resource Type
Collections this item is in