Integrating research experiences into undergraduate life sciences curricula in the form of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) can meet national calls for education reform by giving students the chance to “do science.” In this article, we provide a step-by-step practical guide to help instructors assess their CUREs using best practices in assessment. We recommend that instructors first identify their anticipated CURE learning outcomes, then work to identify an assessment instrument that aligns to those learning outcomes and critically evaluate the results from their course assessment. To aid instructors in becoming aware of what instruments have been developed, we have also synthesized a table of “off-the-shelf” assessment instruments that instructors could use to assess their own CUREs. However, we acknowledge that each CURE is unique and instructors may expect specific learning outcomes that cannot be assessed using existing assessment instruments, so we recommend that instructors consider developing their own assessments that are tightly aligned to the context of their CURE.
Details
- How to Assess Your CURE: A Practical Guide for Instructors of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences
- Shortlidge, Erin (Author)
- Brownell, Sara (Author)
- College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
-
Digital object identifier: 10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1103
-
Identifier TypeInternational standard serial numberIdentifier Value1935-7877
-
Identifier TypeInternational standard serial numberIdentifier Value1935-7885
-
The final version of this article, as published in Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, can be viewed online at: http://www.asmscience.org/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1103
Citation and reuse
Cite this item
This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.
How to Assess Your CURE: A Practical Guide for Instructors of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences. (2016). Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(3), 399-408. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1103