Full metadata
In the 1983 case City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health the US Supreme Court ruled that certain requirements of the city of Akron’s “Regulation on Abortion” ordinance violated women’s rights to abortions. Despite the legalization of abortion in the 1973, with the US Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade, individual states passed legislation regulating certain aspects of abortion. The city of Akron, Ohio, passed legislation in 1978 that regulated when and where abortions could be conducted, the consent process leading up to abortions, and the disposal of fetal remains after abortions. In a six to three ruling, the Court argued provisions of the city of Akron’s ordinance were unconstitutional. The Court’s opinion in City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health reaffirmed the ruling in Roe v. Wade that states could not unduly restrict women’s access to abortions.
- Malladi, Lakshmeeramya (Author)
- Jackson, Lawton L. (Author)
- Gleason, Kevin M. (Editor)
- Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences. Center for Biology and Society. Embryo Project Encyclopedia. (Publisher)
- Arizona Board of Regents (Publisher)
- Akron Center for Reproductive Health (Ohio)
- United States. Supreme Court
- United States. District Court (Ohio : Northern District)
- United States. Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
- Contie, Leroy J., Jr. (Leroy John), 1920-2001
- Powell, Lewis F., Jr., 1907-1998
- United States. Constitution. 14th Amendment
- Roe, Jane, 1947-2017
- women's health
- Legal
- 2023-01-25 08:59:39
- 2023-04-20 05:31:32
- 1 year 6 months ago