Description
Moral status questions, (who and what counts morally) are of central concern to moral philosophers. There is also a rich history of psychological work exploring the topic. The received view in psychology of moral status accounts for it as a function of other mind perception. On this view, entities are morally considerable because they are perceived to have the right sort of minds. This dissertation analyzes and tests this theory, pointing out both empirical and conceptual issues with the received view. The results presented show that important moral intuitions (for example about unjustifiable interpersonal killing) cannot be explained by appealing to other mind perception. Some alternative views of the psychology of moral status are presented, as well as avenues for further research.
Details
Title
- Murdering and Murderable Minds Experiments and Remarks on the Psychology of Moral Status
Contributors
- LaTourelle, Jonathan Jacob (Author)
- Creath, Richard (Thesis advisor)
- Van Gelderen, Elly (Thesis advisor)
- Robert, Jason (Committee member)
- Ellison, Karin (Committee member)
- Becker, D. Vaughn (Committee member)
- Arizona State University (Publisher)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2022
Subjects
Resource Type
Collections this item is in
Note
- Partial requirement for: Ph.D., Arizona State University, 2022
- Field of study: History and Philosophy of Science