168431-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
As the global population continues to increase, so does the need for agriculture resulting in increased fertilizer use. Nanofertilizers and biochar have been proposed as alternatives to fertilizers currently in use to reduce negative environmental impacts. In this study, the

As the global population continues to increase, so does the need for agriculture resulting in increased fertilizer use. Nanofertilizers and biochar have been proposed as alternatives to fertilizers currently in use to reduce negative environmental impacts. In this study, the effects of various nanofertilizers and biochar on the soil microbial community were investigated. Soils treated with graphene nanoplatelet (GNP), graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), graphite nano-additive (GNA) and biochar (BC) at concentrations of 5 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg were sampled before and after a 28-day incubation period. Quantitative PCR assays were carried out against the following target genes: 16S rRNA, nirK, nirS, nifH, amoA and nosZ. Overall, all treatments experienced a decrease in 16S rRNA abundance after the incubation period with an average decrease of 48% however, all treatments were higher in abundance than the control. The abundances of nitrogen (N) cycling functional genes were evaluated in terms of relative abundance as a percentage of 16S rRNA. There was an increase across all treatments in nirK relative abundance over time and when compared to the control. The most notable differences in abundance were in rGO (high) as well as BC. Both nirS and nosZ exhibited an increase over time but decreased compared to the control. A decrease in relative abundances of nifH in BC as well as GO (low) and rGO (high) was observed. Lastly, there was an increase in amoA relative abundance across all treatments after the incubation period. However, all treatments were significantly lower than the control. The increase of denitrifying genes (nirK, nirS and nosZ) and nitrifying genes (amoA) suggests the potential increase in denitrification which can result in increased N loss into the atmosphere and the potential decrease of nitrification resulting in reduced N loss into waterways, respectively. At the time of writing, this study is one of the first to investigate and provide observations on the effects of nanofertilizers on nifH, which is responsible for N-fixation. The results presented here suggest that rGO and BC impart similar effects on the microbial community, whereas GNP had the most significant impact overall.
Reuse Permissions


  • Download restricted.

    Details

    Title
    • The Effect of Nanofertilizers on the Soil Microbial Community
    Contributors
    Date Created
    2021
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Partial requirement for: M.S., Arizona State University, 2021
    • Field of study: Applied Biological Sciences

    Machine-readable links