168360-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
As the world moves towards faster production times, quicker shipping, and overall, more demanding schedules, the humans caught in the loop are subject to physical duress causing them to physically break down and have muscular skeletal injuries. Surprisingly, with more

As the world moves towards faster production times, quicker shipping, and overall, more demanding schedules, the humans caught in the loop are subject to physical duress causing them to physically break down and have muscular skeletal injuries. Surprisingly, with more automation in logistics houses, the remaining workers must be quicker and do more, again resulting in muscular-skeletal injuries. To help alleviate this strain, a class of robotics and wearables has arisen wherein the human is assisted by a worn mechanical device. These devices, traditionally called exoskeletons, fall into two general categories: passive and active. Passive exoskeletons employ no electronics to activate their assistance and instead typically rely on the spring-like qualities of many materials. These are generally lighter weight than their active counterparts, but also lack the assistive power and can even interfere in other routine operations. Active exoskeletons, on the other hand, aim to avoid as much interference as possible by using electronics and power to assist the wearer. Properly executed, this can deliver power at the most opportune time and disengage from interference when not needed. However, if the tuning is mismatched from the human, it can unintentionally increase loads and possibly lead to other future injuries or harm. This dissertation investigates exoskeleton technology from two vantage points: the designer and the consumer. In the first, the creation of the Aerial Porter Exoskeleton (APEx) for the US Air Force (USAF). Testing of this first of its kind exoskeleton revealed a peak metabolic savings of 8.13% as it delivers 30 N-m of torque about each hip. It was tested extensively in live field conditions over 8 weeks to great success. The second section is an exploration of different commercially available exoskeletons and the development of a common set of standards/testing protocols is described. The results show a starting point for a set of standards to be used in a rapidly growing sector.
Reuse Permissions


  • Download restricted.

    Details

    Title
    • Development of an Aerial Porter Exoskeleton and Exoskeleton Standardization Metrics
    Contributors
    Date Created
    2021
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Partial requirement for: Ph.D., Arizona State University, 2021
    • Field of study: Systems Engineering

    Machine-readable links