Water Conservation Potential of Modified Turfgrass Irrigation Management in Urban Parks

There is a considerable need for improved understanding of the outcome and amounts of water used to manage urban landscapes in arid and semiarid cities. Outdoor irrigation in urban parks consists of a large fraction of water demands in Phoenix, Arizona. Hence, ecohydrological processes need to be considered to improve outdoor irrigation management. With the goal of reducing outdoor water use and advancing the general knowledge of water fluxes in urban parks, this study explores water conservation opportunities in an arid city through observations and modeling.Most urban parks in Phoenix consist of a mosaic of turfgrass and trees which receive scheduled maintenance, fertilization and watering through sprinkler or flood irrigation. In this study, the effects that different watering practices, turfgrass management and soil conditions have on soil moisture observations in urban parks are evaluated. Soil moisture stations were deployed at three parks with stations at control plots with no compost application and compost treated sites with either a once or twice per year application instead of traditional fertilizer. An eddy covariance system was installed at a park to help quantify water losses and water, energy and carbon fluxes between the turfgrass and atmosphere. Additional meteorological observations are provided through a network of weather stations. The assessment covers over one year of observations, including the period of turfgrass growth in the warm season, and a period of dormancy during the cool season. The observations were used to setup and test a plot-scale soil water balance model to simulate changes in daily soil moisture in response to irrigation, precipitation and evapotranspiration demand for each park. Combining modeling and observations of climate-soil-vegetation processes, I provide guidance on irrigation schedules and management that could help minimize water losses while supporting turfgrass health in desert urban parks. The irrigation scenarios suggest that water savings of at least 18% can be achieved at the three sites. While the application of compost treatment to study plots did not show clear improvements in soil water retention when compared to the control plots, this study shows that water conservation can be promoted while maintaining low plant water stress.