Description
ABSTRACT Research on self-control theory (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990) consistently supports its' central proposition that low self-control significantly affects crime. The theory includes other predictions, which have received far less empirical scrutiny. Among these is the argument that self-control is developed early in childhood and that individual differences then persist over time. Gottfredson and Hirschi contend that once established by age ten, self-control remains relatively stable over one's life-course (stability postulate). To determine the empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's "stability postulate," a meta-analysis on existing empirical studies was conducted. Results for this study support the contentions made by Gottfredson and Hirschi, however the inclusion of various moderating variables significantly influenced this relationship. Keywords: self-control, self-control stability, absolute stability, relative stability
Included in this item (3)
Permanent Link
Permanent Link
Permanent Link
Details
Title
- Relative vs. absolute stability in self-control: a meta-analysis
- Relative versus absolute stability in self-control
Contributors
Agent
- Meyers, Travis J (Author)
- Pratt, Travis (Thesis advisor)
- Burt, Callie (Committee member)
- Wright, Kevin (Committee member)
- Arizona State University (Publisher)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2013
Subjects
Collections this item is in
Note
-
Appendix B : Self-control studies included in analysis (p. 44-47) issued in separate pdf
-
thesisPartial requirement for: M.S., Arizona State University, 2013
-
bibliographyIncludes bibliographical references (p. 31-41)
-
Field of study: Criminology and criminal justice
Citation and reuse
Statement of Responsibility
by Travis J. Meyers