Description
ABSTRACT This study explored the functions of dialogue in emerging adults' moral turning points. Through purposive sampling, the researcher interviewed 10 emerging adults between 25 and 30 years old about experiences of turning point conversations during the years of 18 and 25. This study employed constant comparative and grounded theory methodologies to analyze messages reported in memorable conversations during this period. Results indicated that dialogue functioned to educate, disturb, and maintain emerging adults' moral perception during this period of moral reorientation. Subcategories under each included dialogue that functioned to explain, invite, warn, direct or instruct, challenge, persuade, agitate, expose, inquire, legitimize, co-reflect, redefine, and affirm or reinforce. This report cites passages from interview data to highlight how dialogic themes informed or shaped changes in moral perception. In each participant's self-reported turning point conversations there was an admixture of dialogic functions at work. Notably, participants' experience of moral turning (degree and trajectory) varied despite there being similarity in intended functions of dialogue.
Contributors
- Danaher, Joshua (Author)
- Waldron, Vincent R. (Thesis advisor)
- Ramsey, Ramsey E (Committee member)
- Kelley, Douglas L. (Committee member)
- Arizona State University (Publisher)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2010
Topical Subject
Language
- eng
Primary Member of
Note
-
thesisPartial requirement for: M.A., Arizona State University, 2010
-
bibliographyIncludes bibliographical references (p. 138-142)
-
Field of study: Communication studies
Additional Information
Extent
- viii, 143 p
Statement of Responsibility
by Joshua Danaher