Full metadata
The Constitution is a document that was made over 200 years ago by a population that could have never imagined the type of technology or social advances made in the 21st century. This creates a natural rift between governing ideals between then and now, that needs to be addressed. Rather than holding the values of the nation to a time when people were not considered citizens because of the color of their skin, there need to be updates made to the Constitution itself. The need for change and the mechanisms were both established by the Framers while creating and advancing the Constitution. The ideal process to go about these changes is split between the formal Article V amendment process and judicial activism. The amendment process has infinite scope for changes that can be done, but due to the challenge involved in trying to pass any form of the amendment through both State and Federal Congresses, that process should be reserved for only fundamental or structural changes. Judicial activism, by way of Supreme Court decisions, is a method best applied to the protection of people’s rights.
- Spradlin, Marcus Tyler (Author)
- Voorhees, Matthew (Thesis director)
- Lennon, Tara (Committee member)
- Historical, Philosophical & Religious Studies (Contributor)
- Historical, Philosophical & Religious Studies, Sch (Contributor)
- School of Criminology and Criminal Justice (Contributor)
- School of Politics and Global Studies (Contributor, Contributor)
- School of Social Transformation (Contributor)
- Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law (Contributor)
- Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
- 2021-04-21 12:25:11
- 2021-08-11 04:09:57
- 3 years 4 months ago