Description
Political polarization is the coalescence of political parties -- and the individuals of which parties are composed -- around opposing ends of the ideological spectrum. Political parties in the United States have always been divided, however, in recent years this division has only intensified. Recently, polarization has also wound its way to the Supreme Court and the nomination processes of justices to the Court. This paper examines how prevalent polarization in the Supreme Court nomination process has become by looking specifically at the failed nomination of Judge Merrick Garland and the confirmations of now-Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. This is accomplished by comparing the ideologies and qualifications of the three most recent nominees to those of previous nominees, as well as analysing the ideological composition of the Senate at the times of the individual nominations.
Details
Title
- Polarization in the Supreme Court Nomination Processes of Merrick Garland, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh
Contributors
- Joss, Jacob (Author)
- Hoekstra, Valerie (Thesis director)
- Critchlow, Donald (Committee member)
- Computer Science and Engineering Program (Contributor)
- School of Politics and Global Studies (Contributor)
- Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2020-05
Subjects
Resource Type
Collections this item is in