Description

We welcome the opportunity to respond to the commentaries on our paper—The Mouse That Trolled—by Hardy, Sarnoff , Cordova, and Feldman. Their comments are academic criticism in the very best sense. We also take the opportunity to update on recent legal

We welcome the opportunity to respond to the commentaries on our paper—The Mouse That Trolled—by Hardy, Sarnoff , Cordova, and Feldman. Their comments are academic criticism in the very best sense. We also take the opportunity to update on recent legal actions, which we had not predicted. This opportunity enriches our narrative history of the patenting of the APPswe mutation for early onset Alzheimer's disease, and we hope the continued saga is of interest.

Reuse Permissions
  • Downloads
    PDF (236.3 KB)

    Details

    Title
    • The Mouse That Trolled (Again)
    Date Created
    2016-03-15
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Identifier
    • Digital object identifier: 10.1093/jlb/lsw006
    • Identifier Type
      International standard serial number
      Identifier Value
      2053-9711
    Note
    • The final version of this article, as published in Journal of Law and the Biosciences, can be viewed online at: https://academic.oup.com/jlb/article/3/1/185/1751296/The-mouse-that-trolled-again

    Citation and reuse

    Cite this item

    This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.

    Cook-Deegan, R., Vishnubhakat, S., & Bubela, T. (2016). The mouse that trolled (again). Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 3(1), 185-191. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsw006

    Machine-readable links